Now, I don't know how that stacks up for new customers. So basically if you own it now, you'll have it. It seems like the products we already bought will remain the way they are. It's the line that says that this only applies to new products going forward.
I can say that there's one thing in there that struck me. I just took a look at the official explanation. But even then it is not the same if you convert your pricing so that you receive your previous price in few months or in few years. It is much less frequent to sell software without some services as subscription. It is technically impossible to sell it any other way. For example YouTube subscription is technically necessary as they need to pay fees to content owners and server costs. It is really hard to comment subscriptions in general way like Quin did. It is less frequent in consumer industry, but even there TelCos, banks and insurance do that in some cases. There is really nothing unethical in that. This is a usual practice in many industries, for example business-to-business sale is frequently performed this way - you approach the clients of another company and try to win them by presenting a better offer. I am not sure exactly where did I criticize the decisions? I have just quoted the facts and their official documents and presented my policies for the same things.
0 kommentar(er)
